|
|
A COMPARISON OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT MODELS IN UPSTREAM OILFIELD AND PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTS |
EMPIRICAL MODEL |
ALLIANCE MODEL |
THIRD PARTY DISPATCH MODEL |
IEX GROUP REGIONAL PRIMARY CARRIER MODEL |
|
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|||
|
1 |
Sales tax applies on freight costs |
|||||
|
2 |
Single-Point-of-Contact, (“one call does all”) service is provided free of charge |
|||||
|
3 |
Invoice process compiles, eliminates errata, and prevents deliberate inflation of charges |
|||||
|
4 |
Freight costs are discounted from the highest possible level (tariff) |
|||||
|
5 |
Brokerage is commonly employed |
NO |
||||
|
6 |
Model can be immediately and routinely deployed in any geographic operating region |
|||||
|
7 |
Model is acceptable to carriers, and Client exercises complete control of logistics |
|||||
|
8 |
Exacting prepayment audit of freight invoices is provided |
|||||
|
9 |
“Value-added” features |
|||||
| 10 |
“Value-subtracted” features |
|||||
|
1 |
(A)Purchase terms are F.O.B. Destination or F.O.B. Origin, Freight Prepaid & Added. Sales tax applies on freight costs. TOP |
|
|
(B) (C) (D) Purchase terms: F.O.B. Origin, Freight Collect are standard. Sales tax on freight is eliminated. TOP |
||
|
2 |
YES |
(B) Larger carriers – mostly agency types - serve as Single-Point-Of-Contact “alliance” carriers. (D) The most reliable, Single-Point-Of-Contact service available is provided on a 24/7/365 basis, free of cost. TOP |
|
(A) Vendors individually arrange carriage with truckers of their choice. Carriers’ business loyalties devolve to vendor/shippers, rather than end user payers of freight. (C) Single-Point-Of-Contact service is provided, but with accompanying fees which must be added to freight costs. TOP |
||
|
3 |
(D) Clients receive highly detailed, completely accurate invoices, compiled and summarized according to individual accounting requirements, and presented in any format desired. TOP |
|
|
(A) Carriers bill vendors, which pass individual freight charges through to clients. Vendors are free to take hidden discounts or increase profits from otherwise inflating freight charges – and can be depended upon to do so. (B) Some alliance models require alliance carriers to compile all invoices, including those of brokered carriers. Others require only the alliance carrier’s invoices to be compiled. Since carriers generally profit from invoice errata and specifically profit from artificially inflating invoice values, any claims that carriers would strive to eliminate invoice errata, or curb a natural tendency to inflate invoice value, should be closely examined. (C) Invoice audit and compilation service is not provided. TOP |
||
|
4 |
(B) Alliance carrier contracts with major E & P Operators are discounted an average 15% from tariff; but such discounts are generally limited to the short-haul environment. TOP (C) Since carriers routinely offer discounts over a broad client base, it is assumed that some discount from tariff would be negotiated. (D) The most efficient, completely remunerative rate structure in the short-haul environment is available at an approximate 18% discount from carriers’ tariffs. Alternatively, this model can utilize clients’ negotiated rates. For long-haul operations, rates are individually negotiated for each instance of carriage. TOP |
|
|
(A) Freight costs (tariff) are the highest possible and cannot be reduced. End user payers of freight are at the mercy of the market. TOP |
||
|
5 |
(B) The alliance model cannot function without brokerage, which is generally cost-additive in the long-haul environment and which, in the short-haul environment, can ONLY serve to increase freight costs. TOP |
|
|
(A) At tariff rates, every load is a “good” load; and brokerage is seldom – if ever – an operational consideration. TOP (C) Third party dispatch employment of brokerage constitutes an oxymoron. A third party dispatch operation which requires brokerage is utterly useless. (D) Brokerage is unnecessary and is not an operational consideration. TOP |
||
|
6 |
(A) Works dependably, without involvement of client, in any geographical operating area. Client bears no logistics staffing expense. TOP (D) The IEX Group model is ready for deployment - with carriers already in place - in every domestic geographic region. |
|
|
(B) Opreations in geographic areas other than the Gulf Coast are left unaddressed. TOP (C) Nothing prevents such a deployment, but no existing third party dispatch agency is possessed of the geographic reach and expertise to execute competently on a multi-region basis; and it is highly unlikely that one ever will. TOP |
||
|
7 |
(D) IEX Group model is completely free of cost to carriers, and reduces carrier operating expense by eliminating brokerage. Clients achieve and retain COMPLETE control of their logistics efforts. While carriage – and carriers – are closely managed, carriers work directly for clients and are answerable directly to clients for operational results. TOP |
|
|
(A) Control of rate and service initiatives devolves to vendors. Clients exercise NO control over their logistics operations or freight costs. (B) Clients and alliance carriers split control of clients’ logistics efforts, with alliance carriers in control of brokered carriers’ operations. Brokered carriers generally have little regard for less desirable loads handed down to them by a competing carrier – more often than not at reduced rates - and uniformly resent working for competitors instead of clients. TOP (C) Logistics control devolves to the third party service provider. TOP |
||
|
8 |
(D) The most exacting prepayment audit process in the industry is accorded each invoice. Clients receive ONLY those invoices which exactly reflect actual operations, at price values mandated by controlling documents. TOP |
|
|
(A) Audits - if performed at all - are performed post-payment, with recovery subject to significant fees. Invoice errata and duplicate billings are either unaddressed, or accorded minimum attention. TOP (B) Any claim that carriers can effectively audit their own invoices is illogical, and should be questioned closely. The alliance model is essentially a dispatch model, and provides no reliable audit capability. Other problems can include varying service costs among brokered carriers, increasing the difficulty of critical review even for professional auditors. Corrective attempts are unlikely at the alliance carrier level. Even should such attempts be made, an uneven effort will produce unpredictable results. TOP (C) It is unlikely that exacting prepayment audit can ever be a feature of third party dispatch models if fee levels are to remain acceptable. |
||
|
9 |
(B) The alliance model reliably capitalizes on most load combination and backhaul opportunities. TOP (C) The third party model reliably capitalizes on most load combination and backhaul opportunities. TOP (D) The IEX Group model captures ALL available load combination and backhaul opportunities of benefit to clients. Additionally, including all fees, IEX averages 30% savings in the long-distance environment by individually negotiating each instance of carriage, and by using client-approved carriers with advantageously positioned equipment. Similarly, including all fees, Datanalysis’ exactingly thorough invoice audit averages 13% savings in the short-haul environment. All savings analyses are calculated using six volume-weighted and rate-averaged alliance contracts as a benchmark. Considering all operations, clients’ net savings equal 21%. TOP |
|
|
(A) There are no "value added" features. What you see is what you get. TOP |
||
|
10 |
(A) The empirical model provides the standard from which “added values” can be both qualified and quantified. It has no feature from which value could be subtracted. TOP (B) This model allows alliance carriers to “report” the savings achieved by their operations. A classic “fox guarding the chickens” syndrome is an unavoidable result - which makes claimed savings highly subjective and difficult to defend. TOP (C) Third party dispatch agencies do not individually negotiate rates or prices; and insufficient opportunities for combined loads and "backhauls" are available to offset their fees. This model can only be supported at an increase from actual freight costs. TOP |
|
|
(D) If a negative aspect or feature of this model can be identified, we'll list it. TOP |